TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking
|
08-27-2021, 11:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-27-2021 11:22 PM by toml_12953.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking
(08-27-2021 03:13 PM)Xorand Wrote: Only changes to the programs were using clock() instead of monotonic() and not using format in the last statement of the benchmark (not supported function). Neither change affected the runtimes. The Nspire CX II CAS does support the format statement. It supports the format statement from an older Python version: print("Runtime: %.2f seconds" %(t)) and it runs in 211.9 sec. Tom L Cui bono? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - toml_12953 - 08-26-2021, 02:28 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - Xorand - 08-27-2021, 03:13 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - Dave Britten - 08-27-2021, 05:43 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - Xorand - 08-30-2021, 02:09 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - Dave Britten - 08-30-2021, 03:22 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - toml_12953 - 08-27-2021, 07:38 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - toml_12953 - 08-27-2021 11:16 PM
RE: TI-84 Plus CE Python Benchmarking - robve - 08-28-2021, 01:49 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)