Post Reply 
HP-35’s x^y Why?
10-31-2021, 07:07 PM
Post: #13
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why?
(10-31-2021 07:45 AM)Peet Wrote:  
(10-30-2021 11:43 PM)Steve Simpkin Wrote:  Well the Prime is, first and foremost, an *algebraic* graphing calculator. X^Y is not an unusual label for the power key on traditional algebraic calculators.

e.g. TI59, TI30, HP22S or HP17B also had y^x because even on this algebraic calculators you type the base first and than the exponent. The HP35 way (exponent enter base -> x^y) was strange but the 35 was the first of its kind and HP didn't know any better at the time. The label on the Prime and a key what makes the opposite (Numworks shares this incoherent behavior) is very weird.

Yes, I spoke too soon. While many early Casio scientific calculator models had X^Y keys, almost every other manufacturer had Y^X keys. No mater how they were labeled, they always worked the same way on algebraic models.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
HP-35’s x^y Why? - Matt Agajanian - 10-30-2021, 06:33 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - toml_12953 - 10-30-2021, 06:43 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - TomC - 10-30-2021, 07:41 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Peet - 10-30-2021, 08:46 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Gerson W. Barbosa - 10-30-2021, 09:54 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Steve Simpkin - 10-30-2021, 11:43 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Peet - 10-31-2021, 07:45 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Steve Simpkin - 10-31-2021 07:07 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Peet - 10-31-2021, 09:18 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Didier Lachieze - 10-31-2021, 09:49 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - lrdheat - 10-31-2021, 12:00 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Steve Simpkin - 10-31-2021, 12:23 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - rprosperi - 10-31-2021, 01:09 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Steve Simpkin - 10-31-2021, 01:34 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Dave Britten - 10-31-2021, 01:31 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - rprosperi - 10-31-2021, 08:18 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Steve Simpkin - 10-31-2021, 09:39 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - rprosperi - 10-31-2021, 11:59 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Steve Simpkin - 11-01-2021, 12:51 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - ijabbott - 11-01-2021, 08:40 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - EdS2 - 11-01-2021, 09:54 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - rprosperi - 11-01-2021, 12:40 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - John Keith - 11-01-2021, 02:47 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - robve - 11-03-2021, 02:37 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - robve - 11-03-2021, 03:46 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Albert Chan - 11-03-2021, 07:45 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - robve - 11-03-2021, 01:44 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Albert Chan - 11-03-2021, 03:21 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - J-F Garnier - 11-03-2021, 07:47 AM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - robve - 11-03-2021, 02:38 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - J-F Garnier - 11-03-2021, 03:43 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - robve - 11-03-2021, 05:46 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - J-F Garnier - 11-03-2021, 06:41 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - robve - 11-03-2021, 08:04 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Albert Chan - 11-03-2021, 06:22 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - cdmackay - 11-02-2021, 04:22 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - ijabbott - 11-02-2021, 08:09 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Gene - 11-02-2021, 04:31 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Jeff O. - 11-04-2021, 09:15 PM
RE: HP-35’s x^y Why? - Guenter Schink - 11-04-2021, 09:21 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)