Poll: What do you prefer? This poll is closed. |
|||
Layout a) | 21 | 50.00% | |
Layout b) | 21 | 50.00% | |
Total | 42 votes | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
[43S] Let's try a poll on the new forum :-)
|
01-28-2014, 09:54 PM
Post: #70
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [43S] Let's try a poll on the new forum :-)
(01-28-2014 09:29 PM)Jonathan Cameron Wrote:(01-28-2014 09:03 PM)walter b Wrote: ... Following your arguments, however, why does the layout of the HP-42S look like [ENTER] [x<>y] [+/-] [E] [<-] ? I'd bet we need [+/-] and [E] more often than [x<>y], don't we? TIA for enlightenment. Hmmh. All the scientific RPN Pioneers had the same layout of this row. And the WP 34S has it as well. AFAIK, there were no earlier RPN pocket calculators with a six-key row. So, if the location next to ENTER is so prominent, why didn't anybody stand up and requested the WP 34S labels being reordered [Enter] [+/-] [EEX] [x<>y] [ <- ] ? d:-? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)