Post Reply 
(28/48/50) Dual Number Functions
03-22-2024, 07:04 PM
Post: #14
RE: (28/48/50) Dual Number Functions
Thanks for confirming my calculations. I was a bit hesitant to question the Double ROM manual and its esteemed author. Smile

I considered using m instead of k, and I may yet reconsider as using m does make some things easier.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: (28/48/50) Dual Number Functions - Gil - 02-20-2024, 10:17 AM
RE: (28/48/50) Dual Number Functions - Gil - 02-21-2024, 12:57 AM
RE: (28/48/50) Dual Number Functions - Gil - 02-21-2024, 04:49 AM
RE: (28/48/50) Dual Number Functions - Gil - 02-21-2024, 04:47 PM
RE: (28/48/50) Dual Number Functions - John Keith - 03-22-2024 07:04 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)