Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion

[jebem]

Yap, it doesn't matter how deep you debug your code or logic circuits, at least one bug remains hidden to be discovered in the field.

I remember to use a WANG PC running a 66MHz Pentium inside at my office, and many jokes were circulating between the IT people in those days.

One joke was like this:
Question: Intel have created the 80286, followed by the 80386, and then the 80486; so, why is the Pentium not called 80586?
Answer: Because when they tried to add 486 + 100 on the new processor they got 584.9999992913.