Set theory (operators)

10242014, 05:31 PM
Post: #11




RE: Set theory (operators)
Well there is that ... (the Math Tools approach, which, naturally, I didn't think of)!
Still, (Math Tools  User  <scroll waaay to the bottom of that list>  User Functions  <scroll through that list>  select function  in my case, I can still type, "intersect({blah}, {blah})," faster. {blah} intersect {blah} works  but {blah} ∩() {blah} doesn't quite get the context correct, and can't work in that format. How would one get past the parens enclosing expected params? Inefficient for sure. Necessary? I don't know. The Prime gods will sort it out, no doubt. Dale 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread 
Set theory (operators)  DrD  10212014, 04:15 PM
RE: Set theory (operators)  Han  10222014, 03:36 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  DrD  10222014, 11:01 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  Joe Horn  10232014, 08:25 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  Alberto Candel  10222014, 03:22 PM
RE: Set theory (operators)  dbbotkin  10242014, 01:57 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  Joe Horn  10242014, 03:57 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  Alberto Candel  10242014, 04:26 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  Joe Horn  10242014, 02:43 PM
RE: Set theory (operators)  DrD  10242014, 10:39 AM
RE: Set theory (operators)  DrD  10242014 05:31 PM
RE: Set theory (operators)  parisse  10242014, 08:39 PM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)