Post Reply 
challenge
06-23-2018, 04:49 PM (This post was last modified: 06-23-2018 05:01 PM by Thomas Okken.)
Post: #41
RE: challenge
(06-23-2018 12:45 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote:  
(06-23-2018 10:48 AM)grsbanks Wrote:  No. We would only say that if we saw the fraction \(4\frac{3}{10}\)

I would translate it to \(\frac{12}{10}\). Shouldn't it be \(4 + \frac{3}{10}\)?

Does saying two numbers right after each other imply multiplication in Italian? Big Grin

Fractions can cause interesting ambiguities in spoken Dutch, too:

100 \(\frac{10}{25}\)
honderd tien vijfentwintigste
(one hundred, ten twenty-fifths)

\(\frac{110}{25}\)
honderdtien vijfentwintigste
(one hundred and ten twenty-fifths)

The only difference between the spoken versions of those two numbers is in their intonation.

3 \(\frac{7}{10}\)
drie zeven tiende
(three, seven tenths)

\(\frac{3}{17}\)
drie zeventiende
(three seventeenths)

etc.
Note that we never use "en" ("and") when saying numbers. Well, some people do, but they all seem to be from the pre-WWII generation... (*)

Needless to say, people don't use fractions unless they're very simple ones, like one and a half kilos of apples, that sort of thing. In school we were taught only the straightforward "pi equals three point one four one five nine" style of pronouncing decimal numbers.

(*) EDIT: With a few exceptions, e.g. 2 \(\frac{1}{2}\) is "twee en een half." I think it's because the unstressed "een" would otherwise mess up the rhythm of that phrase, but I admit I need to think about it, it's a bit more complicated than I thought.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
challenge - Don Shepherd - 01-19-2015, 03:06 PM
RE: challenge - Thomas Klemm - 01-19-2015, 07:22 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 01-19-2015, 09:00 PM
RE: challenge - Gilles - 01-19-2015, 09:08 PM
RE: challenge - brickviking - 06-22-2018, 10:34 AM
RE: challenge - grsbanks - 06-22-2018, 10:40 AM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-22-2018, 01:17 PM
RE: challenge - Thomas Okken - 06-22-2018, 02:22 PM
RE: challenge - burkhard - 06-22-2018, 03:10 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-22-2018, 04:31 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-22-2018, 06:14 PM
RE: challenge - Thomas Klemm - 01-19-2015, 09:12 PM
RE: challenge - Thomas Klemm - 01-19-2015, 09:19 PM
RE: challenge - Gilles - 01-19-2015, 09:37 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 01-19-2015, 10:24 PM
RE: challenge - Katie Wasserman - 01-19-2015, 10:32 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 01-19-2015, 10:52 PM
RE: challenge - Gilles - 01-19-2015, 10:55 PM
RE: challenge - Hlib - 01-20-2015, 06:10 PM
RE: challenge - Gilles - 01-21-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: challenge - Hlib - 01-22-2015, 10:10 AM
RE: challenge - Hlib - 01-21-2015, 04:03 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 01-21-2015, 04:14 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 01-21-2015, 09:32 PM
RE: challenge - Gilles - 01-21-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: challenge - Hlib - 06-21-2018, 02:43 PM
RE: challenge - Paul Dale - 06-22-2018, 12:38 AM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-22-2018, 01:25 AM
RE: challenge - grsbanks - 06-22-2018, 06:59 AM
RE: challenge - ijabbott - 06-22-2018, 07:24 AM
RE: challenge - grsbanks - 06-22-2018, 07:32 AM
RE: challenge - ijabbott - 06-22-2018, 04:26 PM
RE: challenge - Hlib - 06-22-2018, 10:08 PM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-23-2018, 12:15 AM
RE: challenge - ijabbott - 06-23-2018, 09:20 AM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-23-2018, 10:13 AM
RE: challenge - grsbanks - 06-23-2018, 10:22 AM
RE: challenge - Don Shepherd - 06-23-2018, 10:42 AM
RE: challenge - grsbanks - 06-23-2018, 10:48 AM
RE: challenge - Massimo Gnerucci - 06-23-2018, 12:45 PM
RE: challenge - Thomas Okken - 06-23-2018 04:49 PM
RE: challenge - Massimo Gnerucci - 06-23-2018, 06:41 PM
RE: challenge - grsbanks - 06-23-2018, 07:38 PM
RE: challenge - Massimo Gnerucci - 06-23-2018, 08:42 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)