Post Reply 
(35S) yet another R<>P Conversion
01-26-2015, 12:38 AM
Post: #6
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion
(01-25-2015 11:39 PM)Paul Dale Wrote:  
(01-25-2015 11:34 PM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote:  Paul, how do you want LASTx to work with this type of routine; which LASTx should be left in the LASTx register. i know the definition of "value of x just before the last operation" but that definition really depends on the *operations* defined for LASTx. I can think of several ways to make sense of LASTx with a complex decomposition routine. Just wondering what your take was. Thanks.

I think this nails does the reasoning for not doing it pretty well.


hihi LOL... knew that was coming...

Kind regards,
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - MarkHaysHarris777 - 01-26-2015 12:38 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)