Post Reply 
(35S) yet another R<>P Conversion
01-26-2015, 12:38 AM
Post: #6
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion
(01-25-2015 11:39 PM)Paul Dale Wrote:  
(01-25-2015 11:34 PM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote:  Paul, how do you want LASTx to work with this type of routine; which LASTx should be left in the LASTx register. i know the definition of "value of x just before the last operation" but that definition really depends on the *operations* defined for LASTx. I can think of several ways to make sense of LASTx with a complex decomposition routine. Just wondering what your take was. Thanks.

I think this nails does the reasoning for not doing it pretty well.

Pauli

hihi LOL... knew that was coming...

Kind regards,
marcus
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP35s yet another R<>P Conversion - MarkHaysHarris777 - 01-26-2015 12:38 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)