HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
|
02-21-2015, 08:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2015 08:28 PM by Thomas Ritschel.)
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
(02-21-2015 07:51 PM)Tugdual Wrote: Ok, I've got it. Good job, Tugdual! :-) This also explains the other results, e.g.: 0.44491 = -R*X/(-466.92696*X-R) Interesting is also this EQN: Code: -(R*156.25)/(Q*X-208.333333334) In the first run it asks for all three variables, but in the second run it only asks for X and then returns -0.99715. So, obviously here it uses the old result -466.92696 for both variables, R and Q: -0.99715 = -(-466.92696*X)/(-466.92696*X-R) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 07:17 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 06:08 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 07:14 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Klemm - 02-21-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 10:21 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015, 06:05 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 11:24 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015 08:28 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 09:11 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-22-2015, 05:41 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)