newRPL: [UPDATED April 27-2017] Firmware for testing available for download

[Claudio L.]

(04-21-2017 04:06 PM)pier4r Wrote:  I do think the wiki looks already awesome. Typographic details can come later.

So can we take it as stable and start to work on it? (once we get in as users)

My idea was to start a talk discussion (creating the namespace "talks:" ) about ideas on the taxonomy of the wiki. The taxonomy can change of course, but having a guideline every time (say the taxonomy is stable for a year before being slightly modified) helps.

I think it will be more practical and quick to have a few people (the usual suspects in this thread) define the skeleton for the wiki, everybody else will be able to chime in and write about those individual topics, keeping the structure fixed.
It will be much more efficient this way, as endless discussions will have only one outcome: nothing will get done, as it's hard to please everybody, people gets discouraged after unnecessary criticism, etc.
There's a small group here, skilled and willing to write, and I want that group to feel free to write without being criticized for every word. There will be time later (later="when we have an actual manual") to revisit little things, perhaps change an example with another one, explain better an area where readers have trouble, etc.
Let's get the job done, and be criticized for it afterwards, rather than debate how to do it without ever actually doing it. That's the newRPL way.