HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity
|
10-08-2015, 12:34 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity
(10-07-2015 07:37 PM)Dieter Wrote: That's why in close cases (e.g. the one you mentioned) the last digit may be off by one. I don't think it's a rounding issue, it's simply a slight error in the 15-digit result. I think you are right, which makes it even more incredible that some random error in the last digit could "self-correct" back to the original value. I refuse to believe it's a coincidence, there has to be a mathematical explanation for that... but it's beyond my knowledge. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Claudio L. - 10-07-2015, 03:18 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Dieter - 10-07-2015, 07:37 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Claudio L. - 10-08-2015 12:34 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Dieter - 10-08-2015, 07:11 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Claudio L. - 10-08-2015, 08:31 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Dieter - 10-09-2015, 07:45 AM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Claudio L. - 10-09-2015, 12:53 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Dieter - 10-09-2015, 07:47 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Rodger Rosenbaum - 11-03-2015, 05:19 PM
RE: HHC 2015 - Savage benchmark curiosity - Claudio L. - 11-05-2015, 02:18 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)