Post Reply 
newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
10-12-2015, 11:30 PM (This post was last modified: 10-12-2015 11:31 PM by Helix.)
Post: #2
RE: newRPL: Named subroutines proposal
I don't like the fact that this syntax breaks the RPL logic (arguments first, followed by the function).
Furthermore, since comments will be possible in newRPL, I don't see much difference with this version of your example:

Code:
<<
      @ ADDTWO SUBROUTINE
      << 2 + >> 'ADDTWO' LSTO

      @ MAIN PROGRAM
      1234 ADDTWO
>>

Jean-Charles
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: newRPL: Named subroutines proposal - Helix - 10-12-2015 11:30 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)