newRPL: Comments revisited
|
11-18-2015, 02:06 AM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited
(11-17-2015 07:44 PM)compsystems Wrote: Hey, why not use the copyright symbol ©There's a few reasons: a) The @ symbol is part of the original RPL specification, so it makes sense to keep it for compatibility. b) It's common to include a copyright message in programs, so we need the copyright symbol to mean just that. c) As Barry mentioned, not easy to type if you are coding on a PC (we could make it available on the calculator keyboard). (11-17-2015 07:44 PM)compsystems Wrote: 3 cases @ comment the whole line @ .... @ interval one line @@@ @@@ block or multiline I think your idea is very close to what's implemented right now except for the symbol (but even the symbol looks similar), so we are thinking along the same lines. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-02-2015, 08:46 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - David Hayden - 11-02-2015, 08:56 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - rprosperi - 11-03-2015, 01:56 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-03-2015, 06:07 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - matthiaspaul - 11-03-2015, 10:01 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - rprosperi - 11-03-2015, 10:38 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-04-2015, 03:21 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - matthiaspaul - 11-04-2015, 04:31 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-05-2015, 01:50 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - sa-penguin - 11-04-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - compsystems - 11-17-2015, 07:44 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - BarryMead - 11-17-2015, 08:35 PM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - Claudio L. - 11-18-2015 02:06 AM
RE: newRPL: Comments revisited - timofonic - 01-07-2016, 09:05 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)