Battery run competition, category 41
|
12-15-2016, 03:22 AM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Battery run competition, category 41
Hans-peter
The boards I was using had very low specification for quiescent current in the ~x0uA range. But a freshly charged LiPO with the 41C(CV/CX) in standby only lasted about 3 days. What kind of life are you getting with a 41C in standby versus operating? Specifically I used a: 1. SparkFun Power Cell - LiPo Charger/Booster (~50uA) 2. Adafruit Mini Lipo w/Mini-B USB Jack (~25uA) 3. Converter salvaged from a Battery stick All of these should have been several orders of magnitude less then what I actually saw which was batteries dead at low voltage cutoff after about 3 days. I used several different batteries and calculators to test. If I leave the batteries out of a calculator that last as long as I have been testing them (about half a year with only minor voltage drop from full charge). I am a Chem Eng, not a EE, so this is frustrating to me and I do not know that I am doing something wrong. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Battery run competition, category 41 - Hans-Peter - 12-04-2016, 01:11 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - Dieter - 12-04-2016, 08:13 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - Hans-Peter - 12-04-2016, 09:08 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - Nate Martin - 12-13-2016, 02:54 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - Hans-Peter - 12-14-2016, 06:49 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - Nate Martin - 12-15-2016 03:22 AM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - MeindertKuipers - 12-12-2016, 07:58 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - MeindertKuipers - 12-13-2016, 08:01 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - MeindertKuipers - 12-16-2016, 11:30 AM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - MeindertKuipers - 12-16-2016, 06:01 PM
RE: Battery run competition, category 41 - emece67 - 12-18-2016, 03:05 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)