Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators
|
11-30-2017, 07:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-30-2017 08:29 PM by StephenG1CMZ.)
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators
I have just been looking at this benchmark again, and have noticed what seems to be a discrepancy in the on-line pdf spec for the Whetstone benchmark:
http://www.roylongbottom.org.uk/whetston...nchorStart If I am reading this right, the relevant code is: Code:
Which one would expect to deliver -1. But the descriptive text refers to a convergence to 1. Am I misunderstanding the code or text? Should X2,X3 and X4 be 1, -1 or something else on the first output? Does the on-line pdf match the originals (I don't have the paper version to hand). Are their errata? Stephen Lewkowicz (G1CMZ) https://my.numworks.com/python/steveg1cmz |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - StephenG1CMZ - 04-14-2017, 08:58 PM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 04-14-2017, 09:19 PM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - rprosperi - 04-15-2017, 12:00 AM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - Paul Dale - 04-15-2017, 12:05 AM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - StephenG1CMZ - 11-30-2017 07:18 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)