SR-52 was a giant leap. How?
|
06-17-2017, 12:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2017 12:13 AM by Matt Agajanian.)
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
SR-52 was a giant leap. How?
Hi all.
I've wondered about the monumental leaps from the 50A & 51A to the 52/56. Although they were pricey (perhaps moderately affordable) for their day, what technology and cost issues made it possible to add over eight parentheses levels and hierarchy stack when the 51 and 50 only had Sum of Products hierarchy? 10 (SR-56) and over 20 (SR-56) data registers, 100 and 224 step program memories, Single variable statistics for the SR-56, Well, you know the remaining features sets, But, what made it possible and how did TI get so far ahead of functionality improvements between the slide rule and the programmable slide rule? Thanks |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-17-2017 12:12 AM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-17-2017, 12:20 AM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Chasfield - 06-17-2017, 12:21 PM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-17-2017, 05:10 PM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - toml_12953 - 06-18-2017, 01:49 AM
RE: SR-52 was a giant leap. How? - Matt Agajanian - 06-18-2017, 10:23 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)