Which calculators had no known bugs?
|
08-05-2017, 04:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-05-2017 04:52 PM by Sadsilence.)
Post: #20
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which calculators had no known bugs?
Of course you are right and it has to do with internal precision and formula used for all exponantial calculations. But 2^x values are so common to programmers and so easy to handle for processors of all kinds, that I somehow expected a special treatment.
(08-05-2017 04:36 PM)Dieter Wrote:(08-05-2017 08:55 AM)Sadsilence Wrote: Not a real bug, but all classics and most woodstocks are not able to calculate 2^32 correctly. They tell us 4294967304, correct would be 4294967296. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)