Which calculators had no known bugs?
|
08-06-2017, 08:38 PM
Post: #30
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Which calculators had no known bugs?
(08-06-2017 05:42 PM)SlideRule Wrote:Thanks! Between you and Bob P, I'll get the hang of this yet! I thought "g x<>y" was a test for x<>y instead of just exchanging the X and Y stack registers.(08-06-2017 10:31 AM)toml_12953 Wrote: I understand the cases where X>Y and X<Y but how does X=Y work? The way I see it, the execution would be step 1, 2, then, since g X<>Y is false, step 5 is next then, since g X>Y is false, step 8 is next just putting a 1 in the display and not going anywhere. What have I misunderstood?In GRAPHIC format(s), hope it helps. Tom L Cui bono? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: