newRPL - build 1255 released! [updated to 1299]

[The Shadow]

(12-18-2017 04:24 AM)Claudio L. Wrote:  

(12-17-2017 05:15 PM)The Shadow Wrote:  Did it end up acceptably fast for 2000 digits? Then again, at 2000 digits I imagine everything is slow.

Would new RNGs get their own commands?

I didn't run any benchmarks, but feels instantaneous so it's good enough.

Wow, you weren't kidding. I just tested the following program:

<< 1 1000 START RAND DROP END >>

At a precision of 32 digits, it runs in 0.38117 seconds. At 2000, it takes 1.74822 seconds - only 4.5 times longer. At 12 digits, it's 0.37186 seconds.

Meanwhile, on the stock 50g, it's 2.7328 seconds, though of course that was a different algorithm entirely.

Where are the seed numbers stored? They don't seem to be in .Settings.