Post Reply 
13012 vs 12066
01-22-2018, 02:40 PM
Post: #5
RE: 13012 vs 12066
(01-22-2018 10:17 AM)ggauny@live.fr Wrote:  In the BETA the cursor is positionned here : (see the sign !)

JDn:=DateG2JJ!(date); syntax error.

A syntax error is commonly a compilation error, meaning that DateG2JJ has not been compiled correctly or does not yet exist.


If you are using DateG2JJ in previous lines with respect to where you have defined it, you can move it before the function that uses it
Code:
DateG2JJ(date) //Defined before being used in another function
BEGIN
  ....
END;

Other
BEGIN
  LOCAL JDn:=DateG2JJ(date);
END;

Or put lines before "DateG2JJ();"
Code:
DateG2JJ(); //Declared/reserved as a function, for its anticipated use

Other
BEGIN
  LOCAL JDn:=DateG2JJ(date);
END;

DateG2JJ(date)
BEGIN
  ....
END;

I do not think the error is due to the firmware, you can try 13217 instead of 13012

Viga C | TD | FB
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
13012 vs 12066 - ggauny@live.fr - 01-22-2018, 10:17 AM
RE: 13012 vs 12066 - toml_12953 - 01-22-2018, 10:53 AM
RE: 13012 vs 12066 - ggauny@live.fr - 01-22-2018, 11:17 AM
RE: 13012 vs 12066 - DrD - 01-22-2018, 01:07 PM
RE: 13012 vs 12066 - Carlos295pz - 01-22-2018 02:40 PM
RE: 13012 vs 12066 - ggauny@live.fr - 01-22-2018, 03:33 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)