Post Reply 
50g: an interesting RAND anomaly
03-17-2018, 06:41 PM
Post: #4
RE: 50g: an interesting RAND anomaly
I'm no expert in RNG but as far as I understand, the properties of the generated number don't necessarily apply to individual bits.
By properties I mean bias, distribution, and recurrence period. Since an algorithm manipulates each bit differently, you are not supposed to isolate individual bits.
It seems you found that the last 3 bits (hard to define bits on a decimal number, but bear with me) have no bias and good uniform distribution (you got a nice 50/50/50/50), but have a short period, and you even happened to find out what that period is.

Using a different nibble will give you different properties, not necessarily any better.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
50g: an interesting RAND anomaly - DavidM - 03-17-2018, 05:02 PM
RE: 50g: an interesting RAND anomaly - Claudio L. - 03-17-2018 06:41 PM
RE: 50g: an interesting RAND anomaly - ttw - 03-18-2018, 02:03 AM
RE: 50g: an interesting RAND anomaly - ttw - 03-19-2018, 06:31 PM
RE: 50g: an interesting RAND anomaly - ttw - 03-19-2018, 07:35 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)