Easy as { 1 2 3 }? (when { 1 2 3 } ≠ { 1 2 3 })
|
08-07-2018, 11:40 PM
Post: #26
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Easy as { 1 2 3 }? (when { 1 2 3 } ≠ { 1 2 3 })
(08-07-2018 04:07 PM)pier4r Wrote: OT: request to David, could you improve the initial title? Google finds nothing and I had to resort to the MyBB search that is not totally bad if one has enough keywords Hopefully the first subject is now more explicit. (08-07-2018 04:07 PM)pier4r Wrote: Today I got for the first time a problem similar to this. On my 50g version 2.15 . Somehow one of my programs incremented a list until { 6. 6. } (n1) and another compared it to a list set to { 6. 6. } manually in a global variable and the 50g said "nope, they are different". I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you are using a version of ListExt prior to the one I recently sent you via email (1.2.0). In particular, the I→NL command is what I would guess is the root of the problems you are running into. In pre-1.2.0 versions, it would create explicit reals in the -9..9 range instead of references to built-in ROM versions of those. 1.2.0 (and forward) fixes that, and reals should match as you would normally expect. The problem you'll face, though, is that LDDUP in version 1.2.0 is broken in that it doesn't de-dup sublists that match (see the post in the ListExt thread). I'm a little short on time due to family obligations at the moment, but I'll attempt to remedy that as soon as possible with a 1.2.1 update. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)