12C vs 11C program, 11C not working

[calcphil12c11c]

(12-17-2018 05:11 AM)Thomas Klemm Wrote:  The sequence produced by your HP-11C is:
3.78¹ = 3.78
3.78² = 14.29
3.78³ = 54.01
3.78⁴ = 204.16
3.78⁵ = 771.72
3.78⁶ = 2917.10

I can simulate that behaviour by using SST before R/S:

1 f A -3.78
2 SST 20
R/S -14.29
3 SST 30
R/S -54.01
4 SST 40
R/S -204.16

-1 SST -10
R/S -771.72
-2 SST -20
R/S -2917.10

What happens is that the 0 in line 12 is appended to the input.

However I experience the same behaviour with the HP-12C.

Could you check what happens if you use ENTER to complete your entry?

1 f A -3.78
2 ENTER R/S ?
3 ENTER R/S ?
4 ENTER R/S ?

-1 ENTER R/S ?
-2 ENTER R/S ?

For my tests I used version 1.0.1 of nonpareil for OS X
Copyright 2005-2012 Maciej Bartosiak
based on Nonpareil 0.77 for Linux
Copyright 2004-2006 Eric Smith

Thus the real hardware could behave differently.

Cheers
Thomas

That works! Using ENTER now follows the 12C program.

Can't use the x<0 as the 12C does not have that function.

*If this really happens it's a bug in the simulator as on a real hardware 11C the [R/S] key enables stack lift.*

So on a 'real' 11C the R/S enables a stack lift? Just want to know please.

*** Thank you! ***