Post Reply 
42S local label caching
11-16-2019, 04:50 PM
Post: #14
RE: 42S local label caching
I seem to remember the ENDs' and global labels' distance fields were coded the same way as in long-form GTOs.
On Emu42, I get the 'Global Span' error trying to add a single byte to a 3578-Byte Prgm containing 1789 NOT lines. I was not going to do that on my real 42S ;-) So there, at least, is no difference with the 41.

Cheers, Werner

41CV†,42S,48GX,49G,DM42,DM41X,17BII,15CE,DM15L,12C,16CE
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
42S local label caching - Dave Britten - 11-11-2019, 05:54 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-11-2019, 06:18 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Dave Britten - 11-11-2019, 06:56 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-13-2019, 02:00 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-13-2019, 02:06 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Andres - 11-11-2019, 07:06 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Dave Britten - 11-11-2019, 07:28 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-14-2019, 04:00 AM
RE: 42S local label caching - Joe Horn - 11-14-2019, 10:54 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-15-2019, 05:42 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Joe Horn - 11-15-2019, 09:48 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-16-2019, 03:25 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Werner - 11-16-2019 04:50 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-16-2019, 11:33 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Sylvain Cote - 11-16-2019, 11:22 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Joe Horn - 11-17-2019, 12:50 PM
RE: 42S local label caching - Werner - 11-17-2019, 09:37 AM
RE: 42S local label caching - J-F Garnier - 11-17-2019, 09:51 AM
RE: 42S local label caching - Werner - 11-17-2019, 07:03 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)