serious inverse matrix bug?
|
12-05-2019, 01:16 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: serious inverse matrix bug?
I forwarded on to the CAS author and it has been corrected. Only looked like it happened due to the approximate number in there.
1/2*s would have worked fine. TW Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
serious inverse matrix bug? - deachp - 12-05-2019, 04:49 AM
RE: serious inverse matrix bug? - Tim Wessman - 12-05-2019 01:16 PM
RE: serious inverse matrix bug? - Albert Chan - 12-05-2019, 01:38 PM
RE: serious inverse matrix bug? - parisse - 12-05-2019, 07:10 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)