Post Reply 
serious inverse matrix bug?
12-05-2019, 01:16 PM
Post: #2
RE: serious inverse matrix bug?
I forwarded on to the CAS author and it has been corrected. Only looked like it happened due to the approximate number in there.

1/2*s would have worked fine.

TW

Although I work for HP, the views and opinions I post here are my own.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
serious inverse matrix bug? - deachp - 12-05-2019, 04:49 AM
RE: serious inverse matrix bug? - Tim Wessman - 12-05-2019 01:16 PM
RE: serious inverse matrix bug? - parisse - 12-05-2019, 07:10 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)