The death of calculator market?

[Hlib]

`pier4r` pid=`137588` dateline=`1602533833` Wrote:

`Hlib` pid=`137579` dateline=`1602523706` Wrote:Because I can write a huge book about 50g`s hardwarebugs and lags. But I won`t repeat myself here.

Well I am sorry for you experience, in my little experience I didn`t experience much bugs. Moreover everything is bugged, there is no non-trivial software that is error free. But as long as the bugs are rare encounters, then it is all fine.

I do not pay special attention to software bugs, this is quite normal. I just know a little about electronics and compare technical solutions from HP amateurs against the same solutions from CASIO in hardware.
I do not delve into more complex technological solutions, because on this forum I was not given elementary answers about at least the power scheme in hp-39gii/50g, which is simply terrible in comparison with CASIO fx-2.0/fx-9860gii/giii. For example, the fx-9850g etc/ti-84+/ti-84+CE are terrible calculators compared to the correct technical solutions in the fx-9750g/fx-2.0/ti-83+. I`m sorry, I don`t spend a lot of time on technical issues, because this is not my specialty. Nevertheless, it is very bad to deceive consumers, which is what HP, TI and CASIO are constantly doing.
I ask: why "hp" ... and so on ... They answer me - because "hp" are the best calculators in the world. Where are the engineers, not the programmers and managers?
Over the past 20 years, CASIO has not been able to solve the problem in its programming language: "ABC"➝ Str (expression). But we are worried about Python and CAS. :-)