Post Reply 
TI59 Diagnostic forensics
07-28-2020, 05:43 PM
Post: #18
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics
(07-27-2020 09:51 PM)rprosperi Wrote:  The 67 returns 1.2692E-04.

Not surprisingly, the error comes from the first pair of terms (REC(POL(theta,r)).

I used DEG mode and all the actual functions as built in the 67 (so, e.g. I used [3] [X^2] rather than [3] [ENTER] [*] ).

Is 1.2692E-04 already the result after multiplication by 1E10? I ask because this would imply an internal precision of 18 digits for the HP.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-26-2020, 06:47 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - johanw - 07-27-2020, 01:15 AM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-27-2020, 02:20 AM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - pinkman - 07-27-2020, 09:35 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-27-2020, 03:51 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-27-2020, 09:51 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-28-2020, 06:55 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-28-2020, 10:05 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-28-2020, 05:17 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-28-2020 05:43 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-28-2020, 07:01 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-28-2020, 08:49 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-28-2020, 09:57 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-27-2020, 03:57 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Werner - 07-28-2020, 10:09 AM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-28-2020, 12:51 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - johanw - 07-29-2020, 07:46 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Pjwum - 07-29-2020, 08:49 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Werner - 07-30-2020, 02:11 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - Werner - 07-28-2020, 01:13 PM
RE: TI59 Diagnostic forensics - rprosperi - 07-28-2020, 04:31 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)