Larger stack size
|
12-28-2020, 07:58 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Larger stack size
(12-28-2020 06:38 PM)hth Wrote: I think contrived is the word, possibly also "perfectly presented to suit the particular key entry model". Yeah, this example is obviously quite contrived, but I'm sure we've all run into at least one formula where naively diving in at the left will overflow the stack. I don't know that an 8-level stack to match the TI would have made any practical sense, but an extra level or two would have been welcome, and I know I've run into plenty of situations where I have to try really hard not to lose something off the top when writing a program. I'm just surprised I've not seen any talk of it newsletters or literature from the era. On the TI, I think the bigger risk of plugging in a whole formula is not so much that you aren't seeing the intermediate results quite like you are with RPN, but rather you're at the mercy of the crummy keyboard not sabotaging your efforts with a bounce that goes unnoticed. (In fairness, my 58C actually has a pretty good keyboard, only requiring an occasional second/harder press on the D key.) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)