Post Reply 
Problem with BankSwitching on V41 R9E
03-23-2021, 08:42 AM (This post was last modified: 03-23-2021 08:43 AM by Ángel Martin.)
Post: #4
RE: Problem with BankSwitching on V41 R9E
(03-22-2021 05:23 PM)Christoph Giesselink Wrote:  But it's only a minor change to restore the old behavior "fail-safe return" to bank 1 for all modules with the exception for the RAMBOX module in R9F. R9F with an XLarge background image will be published very soon. So the "fail-safe return" fix is a so called "last minute" change.

Yes please, that will ensure a smooth behavior across all other modules for cases when the return to bank-1 was not explicitly coded (I know, not a good practice but hey...)

BTW there is another case similar to the RAMBOX that perhaps should also be on the same "exclusion" list: the ZEPROMS do allow running of user code (FOCAL) in secondary banks. I think this is the same condition on PWOFF but you will know better. However it's perhaps not possible to tell the presence of ZEPROMS (how are they different on V41 from "regular" QRAM?

Best,
ÁM

"To live or die by your own sword one must first learn to wield it aptly."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Problem with BankSwitching on V41 R9E - Ángel Martin - 03-23-2021 08:42 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)