About DM32

[Vincent Weber]

Many thanks Bob, much appreciated.

I think DM32 has the potential over time to become what the 35S should have been, while retaining full compatibility with the 32SII. This would require:
-Local labels as described in your video;
-increased (800+?) number of registers through indirection (although 26 is enough for most computations, except for matrices, but matrix handling has never been a strong point of the 32 series, the 42s is way better for that) ;
-Better equation editing, navigate with left and right arrows rather than having to delete steps down to the error, and automatic double parenthesis generation like in SIN() ;
-Support for STOring in intermediate variables in equations;
-Support for read access of REGX, REGY, REGZ and REGT in equations;
-Support for one-line complex numbers, so that you can write programs that operate seamlessly on complex or real numbers... while keeping the extraction of real and imaginary parts (unlike the 35S) and retaining the 32SII 2-level way, for compatibility;
-Support for vectors? Maybe not, they are so poorly done on the 35S...

Best regards