Post Reply 
Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective.
09-23-2023, 06:45 PM (This post was last modified: 09-23-2023 06:51 PM by carey.)
Post: #9
RE: Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective.
(09-23-2023 05:19 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote:  MoHPC don't like Youtube shorts....

The link: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1R3IMq227dM

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/1R3IMq227dM

(09-23-2023 05:21 PM)Csaba Tizedes Wrote:  Same, without d/dx()

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-8pGxTXSk40

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-8pGxTXSk40

Csaba,

These videos are great -- very nicely done! Thank you for sharing them!

A quick question about Newton's method (shown in the videos). Newton's method has stood the test of time and has sound justification in Taylor series. Of the dozens* of other root-finding methods that have been developed over the years, some general and some claiming to have advantages in special situations, are there one or two of these alternative methods that you have found particularly worthwhile to try in situations where Newton's method doesn't perform well? Thanks!

* Alternative root-finding methods include bisection, secant, regula falsi, Halley's, Broyden's, fixed point iteration, Steffenson's, Ridder's, Brent's, Muller's, Bairstow's, Durand-Kerner, and more...!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Putting Casio fx-991CW in perspective. - carey - 09-23-2023 06:45 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)