Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
|
10-18-2014, 07:14 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
(10-16-2014 09:53 PM)jebem Wrote: Yap, it doesn't matter how deep you debug your code or logic circuits, at least one bug remains hidden to be discovered in the field.https://software.intel.com/blogs/2014/10...s-software Quote:Another alternative is to use a good quality mathematical library implementation of the sine function. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - BruceH - 10-15-2014, 09:31 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - jebem - 10-16-2014, 09:53 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - pito - 10-18-2014 07:14 AM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - Werner - 10-18-2014, 04:40 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - pascal_meheut - 10-18-2014, 05:32 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - Werner - 10-18-2014, 05:57 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)