Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
|
10-18-2014, 04:40 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion
The latest version of Free42 uses the double precision Intel decimal float library, and this gets it right: SIN(PI) is correct to all 34 digits.
WP-34S' SIN(PI) in double precision is correct to 17 digits. Cheers, Werner 41CV†,42S,48GX,49G,DM42,DM41X,17BII,15CE,DM15L,12C,16CE |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - BruceH - 10-15-2014, 09:31 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - jebem - 10-16-2014, 09:53 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - pito - 10-18-2014, 07:14 AM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - Werner - 10-18-2014 04:40 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - pascal_meheut - 10-18-2014, 05:32 PM
RE: Intel underestimates error bounds by 1.3 quintillion - Werner - 10-18-2014, 05:57 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)