Post Reply 
Question for Trig Gurus
12-04-2014, 02:36 AM (This post was last modified: 12-05-2014 01:07 AM by Gerson W. Barbosa.)
Post: #17
RE: Question for Trig Gurus
[Image: Trigguru_zps230f40d1.png]


(12-02-2014 07:34 PM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote:  For the range 1/2..1, we use simmetry.

This is completely wrong (including spelling), sorry! Desirable accuracy should be granted in the range [0..sqrt(2)/2], then for the range [sqrt(2)/2..1] we use the formula

asin(x) = 90° - asin(sqrt(1 - x^2))

So the previous approximation has been adjusted for a wider range. It's somewhat less accurate, but still good for practical purposes:

asin(x) ~ 90*(2*e^(-16.01031715*e^(-1.950569752*x)) + e^(x) - e^(-x))/pi

Examples:

x asin(x)

0.00 00.00
0.05 02.87
0.10 05.74
0.15 08.63
0.20 11.54
0.25 14.48
0.30 17.46
0.35 20.48
0.40 23.57
0.45 26.74
0.50 29.99 (30.00)
0.55 33.37
0.60 36.88
0.65 40.55
0.70 44.43
0.71 45.23

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plo...282%29%2F2

-------------------------------

Somewhat better:

asin(x) ~ 180/pi*(0.000005592*(x + 1)^15.096 + sinh(x))

or

asin(x) ~ 90/pi*e^(-x)*(0.000011184*e^x*(x + 1)^15.096 + e^(2*x) - 1)

Examples:

x asin(x)

0.00 00.000
0.05 02.867 (02.866)
0.10 05.740 (05.739)
0.15 08.629 (08.627)
0.20 11.541 (11.537)
0.25 14.483 (14.478)
0.30 17.465 (17.458)
0.35 20.495 (20.487)
0.40 23.586 (23.578)
0.45 26.750 (26.744)
0.50 30.002 (30.000)
0.55 33.365 (33.367)
0.60 36.864 (36.870)
0.65 40.536 (40.542)
0.70 44.429 (44.427)
0.71 45.239 (45.235)

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plo...282%29%2F2

---------------

Less accurate, but more simple:

asin(x) ~ sinh(x)*(2 - (1 - x^6)^(1/6))*180/pi
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-01-2014, 07:49 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - toml_12953 - 12-01-2014, 08:08 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - PANAMATIK - 12-01-2014, 08:46 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-01-2014, 10:54 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - toml_12953 - 12-02-2014, 02:30 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-02-2014, 09:21 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-02-2014, 04:57 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Gerson W. Barbosa - 12-04-2014 02:36 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Albert Chan - 07-29-2022, 03:19 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Mark Hardman - 12-01-2014, 11:00 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 12-02-2014, 12:09 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-02-2014, 12:16 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 12-02-2014, 01:12 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-02-2014, 01:50 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-02-2014, 01:49 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-05-2014, 02:48 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Namir - 12-09-2014, 02:19 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 07-29-2022, 12:59 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - ttw - 07-29-2022, 10:19 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 07-30-2022, 08:26 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Albert Chan - 07-30-2022, 06:27 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 07-30-2022, 09:38 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 07-31-2022, 11:08 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Albert Chan - 07-31-2022, 09:54 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 08-01-2022, 05:19 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Albert Chan - 08-01-2022, 02:36 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 08-02-2022, 06:35 AM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Albert Chan - 08-02-2022, 05:28 PM
RE: Question for Trig Gurus - Thomas Klemm - 08-03-2022, 04:42 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)