Post Reply 
HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
02-21-2015, 06:05 PM
Post: #6
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
(02-21-2015 10:21 AM)Thomas Ritschel Wrote:  
(02-21-2015 07:17 AM)MarkHaysHarris777 Wrote:  If we force the EQN system to stack another nested () then the binary representation of reals in the intermediate results change and the problem goes away... try it.

Apart from your example I tried the following variants of the same equation. While some of them are working, I was able to generate a bunch of other bad results:

Yes, I went down that path as well. The real problem (for this example) is the value of R (and as Tugdual points out) also the use of variables. The EQN system has some issues, and as we'll see in bug # 15 (coming later) some of that can cause data loss if you're not aware.

Cheers,
marcus
Smile

Kind regards,
marcus
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - MarkHaysHarris777 - 02-21-2015 06:05 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 11:24 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 09:11 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)