Post Reply 
HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
02-21-2015, 08:28 PM (This post was last modified: 02-21-2015 08:28 PM by Thomas Ritschel.)
Post: #10
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14
(02-21-2015 07:51 PM)Tugdual Wrote:  Ok, I've got it.

31.32309 = -R*X/(-466.92696*Q-R)

Good job, Tugdual! :-)

This also explains the other results, e.g.:
0.44491 = -R*X/(-466.92696*X-R)

Interesting is also this EQN:
Code:
-(R*156.25)/(Q*X-208.333333334)

In the first run it asks for all three variables, but in the second run it only asks for X and then returns -0.99715.

So, obviously here it uses the old result -466.92696 for both variables, R and Q:
-0.99715 = -(-466.92696*X)/(-466.92696*X-R)
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 08:45 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 11:24 AM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Thomas Ritschel - 02-21-2015 08:28 PM
RE: HP35s Revisited Bug # 14 - Tugdual - 02-21-2015, 09:11 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)