Complex Lock mode for WP-34s
|
04-13-2015, 01:55 PM
Post: #35
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Complex Lock mode for WP-34s
(04-12-2015 02:59 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote: I'm sorry for my absence; other pressing matters have been engaging my attention. I'm back now! No need to apologize, glad you are are back. (04-12-2015 02:59 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote: [*]"Mod:" and "Arg:" have changed to "Length:" and "Angle:", which seemed to be the most popular choice. However, what about "Amp:" and "Phase:"? This might make the electrical engineers even happier. I cannot speak for all electrical engineers, but I work with a variety of value types in complex polar form in addition to Amperes, i.e. Volts, MVA, and impedance, so "Amp:" and "Phase:" would not fit in all cases. Better to have more universal names that apply to all types of values. (04-12-2015 02:59 PM)Nigel (UK) Wrote: Or how about using "r:" and "theta:" (Walter's suggestion, I think) in CPXI mode, while allowing another pair of names in CPXJ mode? I have no objection to "Length:" and "Angle:" or to "r:" and "theta:". If you wish to implement a difference pair of component names when CPXJ mode is selected, my preference would be "Mag:" and "Angle:" since that is the way I learned it in my EE course work all those years ago. (Again not trying to speak for all EEs, just my personal preference.) Thanks for your continued work on this, I am anxious to try the latest version. Jeff Dave - My mind is going - I can feel it. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)