log(value,base) versus logb(value,base)
|
04-11-2015, 11:39 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: log(value,base) versus logb(value,base)
In the CAS environment, objects separated by commas are elements of a list. Thus command(a,b,c,d) is actually interpreted as command([a,b,c,d]) where [] is a list (in the CAS environment). Secondly, LOG() and log() are different commands. You are probably trying to evaluate LOG(e,i), which is \( \log_i(e) \). However, if you type log(e,i) in the CAS environment then this is equivalent to LN({e,i}) in the Home environment since the CAS implements ln(x) as log(x) -- most CAS do this as well.
That said, when I type in log(e,i) in the CAS view, I get \( [1 \quad \frac{i}{2}*\pi ] \) and not the reverse-ordered list that you typed. Graph 3D | QPI | SolveSys |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
log(value,base) versus logb(value,base) - compsystems - 04-11-2015, 12:32 PM
RE: log(value,base) versus logb(value,base) - Tim Wessman - 04-11-2015, 03:31 PM
RE: log(value,base) versus logb(value,base) - compsystems - 04-11-2015, 10:33 PM
RE: log(value,base) versus logb(value,base) - Han - 04-11-2015 11:39 PM
RE: log(value,base) versus logb(value,base) - compsystems - 04-13-2015, 02:35 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)