Post Reply 
A case against the x<>y key
05-11-2015, 12:20 AM
Post: #29
RE: A case against the x<>y key
(05-10-2015 10:43 AM)hansklav Wrote:  Well, as Paul Dale pointed out, on a four level stack RPN calculator then you will run into trouble (stack overflow, leading to a wrong answer, without warning), unless, of course, you make use of STO and RCL.

No, you don't. As it happens, I started with the most complicated term in that equation, which happened to be at the right-hand end, and then worked to the left, adding - and subtracting - terms, but never ran out of stack. It would have worked equally well going from left to right, though.

So I'm afraid I'm still not seeing a problem. In practice, RPN users tend to be scientists and engineers, for whom the calculation represents physical quantities and logical steps in getting an answer. RPN meets their needs very well with a four-level stack. It only runs into trouble if you try to evaluate complex algebraic expressions left-to-right in a kind of mindlessly algorithmic fashion. I can't help feeling that you're approaching RPN with the wrong mindset.

--- Les
[http://www.lesbell.com.au]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-09-2015, 10:49 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-10-2015, 12:56 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:25 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:37 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:43 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 02:32 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 03:51 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-11-2015, 12:09 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 12:24 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015 12:20 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Tugdual - 05-10-2015, 04:06 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - d b - 05-10-2015, 05:16 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 10:59 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-10-2015, 09:37 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 03:39 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-11-2015, 09:41 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 04:18 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 06:10 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - RMollov - 05-11-2015, 09:49 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-11-2015, 10:27 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - hansklav - 05-17-2015, 10:49 PM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - d b - 05-12-2015, 12:35 AM
RE: A case against the x<>y key - Les Bell - 05-12-2015, 01:41 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)