WP-32S in 2016?
|
01-01-2016, 02:19 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: WP-32S in 2016?
(01-01-2016 03:14 AM)Paul Dale Wrote: The UNDO feature of the 31S uses a lot of RAM. Storing a reasonable number of program steps and having a decent number of registers would preclude UNDO. If we'd limit UNDO to restoring the stack (and drop restoring the other registers) it should be less RAM-consuming, isn't it? Layout-wise, I'm a bit reluctant designing something new for the HP-30b. If, OTOH, the DMxxL platform (or something close to it) would qualify, it would be another story. Michael? d:-? |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)