Post Reply 
[WP 34S] Ideas for improving unit conversions
02-03-2014, 02:46 PM
Post: #18
RE: [WP 34S] Ideas for improving unit conversions
(02-03-2014 03:51 AM)Jonathan Cameron Wrote:  Looks like it is not possible to spell it out (feet.srv since this leads to labels that are longer than 9 characters, which seems to be the limit.
Even if the 2 + 6 character limit that Pauli mentioned could be overcome, it just wouldn't fit on the screen.

Alternatively, 'feet' could be changed to 'ft' to maintain consistency. That's an abbreviation everyone would likely recognize, but changing 'acres' to 'ac' in a similar manner would be somewhat confusing. At the end of the day, I don't think it really matters what U.S. survey foot based units are called as barely anyone would ever need them, what's important is that those who do not need the survey units don't end up using them by accident.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: [WP 34S] Ideas for improving unit conversions - Bit - 02-03-2014 02:46 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)