Post Reply 
Prime numbers
03-24-2016, 08:07 AM
Post: #6
RE: Prime numbers
(03-24-2016 07:15 AM)brouhaha Wrote:  Perhaps I misunderstand, but if you did that, you still couldn't exactly represent 1/5 in place value with a finite number of digits after the radix mark, so you'd still have to round it.

This was my first thought too....

Using a factorial base would avoid most rounding errors but not all of them. Transcendental functions would produce non-rational results which would require rounding.


Pauli
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Prime numbers - Tugdual - 03-22-2016, 07:49 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Valentin Albillo - 03-23-2016, 10:46 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Massimo Gnerucci - 03-23-2016, 11:17 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Valentin Albillo - 03-24-2016, 07:17 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Vtile - 03-23-2016, 11:51 PM
RE: Prime numbers - brouhaha - 03-24-2016, 07:15 AM
RE: Prime numbers - Paul Dale - 03-24-2016 08:07 AM
RE: Prime numbers - Tugdual - 03-24-2016, 11:59 AM
RE: Prime numbers - Don Shepherd - 03-24-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Tugdual - 03-24-2016, 07:51 PM
RE: Prime numbers - emece67 - 03-25-2016, 12:24 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Tugdual - 03-25-2016, 07:29 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Claudio L. - 03-25-2016, 12:41 PM
RE: Prime numbers - Didier Lachieze - 03-25-2016, 01:07 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)