Post Reply 
ACOS logarithmic form
04-28-2016, 03:29 PM
Post: #2
RE: ACOS logarithmic form
(04-28-2016 03:07 PM)Claudio L. Wrote:  Here's my dilemma:
I think I figured it out.
I think the formula is right, but the only difference is which branch of the sqrt() you take. For whatever reason, for real numbers the 50g and Wolfram take the negative root, which provides the sign change.
Are there any conventions as far as which branch to take?

If I take an arbitrary number like (2 3), I get the right value, but on reals it goes to the wrong solution (actually I shouldn't say the wrong solution, as both are correct solutions, just goes to "another" solution).
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-28-2016, 03:07 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-28-2016 03:29 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-28-2016, 05:03 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Dieter - 04-28-2016, 06:44 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-28-2016, 08:23 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Csaba Tizedes - 04-29-2016, 01:33 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Ángel Martin - 04-28-2016, 06:42 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-28-2016, 08:29 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Ángel Martin - 04-29-2016, 06:06 AM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-29-2016, 02:39 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 04-29-2016, 02:19 AM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Sylvain Cote - 04-29-2016, 02:50 AM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Ángel Martin - 04-29-2016, 06:00 AM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - ljubo - 04-29-2016, 09:15 PM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Ángel Martin - 04-30-2016, 07:01 AM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - ljubo - 04-30-2016, 08:57 AM
RE: ACOS logarithmic form - Claudio L. - 05-01-2016, 03:58 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)