[request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases
|
10-12-2016, 06:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2016 02:34 AM by compsystems.)
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
RE: [request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases
(10-12-2016 04:20 PM)Han Wrote: If you place a space in between a and |x| however, it will produce an error (i.e. not allowing implicit multiplication). in the next firmware or updates, I hope some templates to add a space (as prefix), this solves the problem =), but I would like more than the parser is "smarter", ie, to analyze the prefix, and try to realize of the implicit multiplication in the following cases the hp-prime made implicit multiplication Code: {a3/4, a∛2, 3a, 3a3/4} -> { a*(3/4), a*∛2, 3*a, 3*a*(3/4) } Han Wrote:The [] notation for referencing elements is to avoid ambiguity introduced using (),That is, should f(1) mean evaluate the function f at 1? or should it mean the first element in a composite object stored in f? I think TI-DERIVE use another symbol (↓) to avoid this math computer ambiguity a:=[[9,8,7]]; a↓(1,2) -> 8 |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
[request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases - compsystems - 10-11-2016, 12:52 PM
RE: [request] improve implicitly multiplication in some cases - StephenG1CMZ - 10-11-2016, 02:52 PM
RE: [request] improve implicitly multiplication in some cases - compsystems - 10-11-2016, 07:30 PM
RE: [request] improve implicitly multiplication in some cases - Han - 10-12-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: [request] improve implicitly multiplication in some cases - compsystems - 10-12-2016, 03:44 PM
RE: [request] improve implicitly multiplication in some cases - Han - 10-12-2016, 04:20 PM
RE: [request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases - compsystems - 10-12-2016 06:59 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)