Post Reply 
[request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases
10-12-2016, 06:59 PM (This post was last modified: 10-13-2016 02:34 AM by compsystems.)
Post: #7
RE: [request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases
(10-12-2016 04:20 PM)Han Wrote:  If you place a space in between a and |x| however, it will produce an error (i.e. not allowing implicit multiplication).

in the next firmware or updates, I hope some templates to add a space (as prefix), this solves the problem =), but I would like more than the parser is "smarter", ie, to analyze the prefix, and try to realize of the implicit multiplication

in the following cases the hp-prime made implicit multiplication
Code:
{a3/4, a∛2, 3a, 3a3/4} -> { a*(3/4), a*∛2, 3*a, 3*a*(3/4) }

[Image: implicitlyMultiplication_image5.jpg]

Han Wrote:The [] notation for referencing elements is to avoid ambiguity introduced using (),That is, should f(1) mean evaluate the function f at 1? or should it mean the first element in a composite object stored in f?

I think TI-DERIVE use another symbol (↓) to avoid this math computer ambiguity

a:=[[9,8,7]];
a↓(1,2) -> 8
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: [request] improve implicit multiplication in some cases - compsystems - 10-12-2016 06:59 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)