Mersenne Twister implentation
|
02-05-2017, 05:37 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation
(02-04-2017 04:19 PM)KeithB Wrote: Just wondering out loud here... Is the above quicker than: Code: L9:=MAKELIST(#0d,A,1,624); Somehow I'm guessing that the loop involved in MAKELIST, running at system level, is going to be faster than a FOR loop in user code. Also, no need for the local variable but it will clobber the 'A' home variable and anything in L9 beyond the 624th element, although the latter is a non-problem if this is an initialization function anyway. Just curious... Godwin Stewart (happy HP Prime owner since Wednesday) |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Mersenne Twister implentation - KeithB - 02-04-2017, 04:19 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - grsbanks - 02-05-2017 05:37 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - rprosperi - 02-05-2017, 07:00 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - grsbanks - 02-05-2017, 09:53 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - grsbanks - 02-06-2017, 07:58 AM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - rprosperi - 02-06-2017, 11:23 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - KeithB - 02-06-2017, 04:42 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - grsbanks - 02-06-2017, 06:24 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - KeithB - 02-06-2017, 07:08 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - Tim Wessman - 02-06-2017, 10:18 PM
RE: Mersenne Twister implentation - grsbanks - 02-07-2017, 08:24 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)