Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators
|
04-15-2017, 12:05 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators
I imagine the Whetstone benchmark was too large for the early handheld calculators. The first HP calculators that might have had enough memory would have been the 41's (RPN) or 28's (RPL). The BASIC handhelds too. They'd have been very slow.
Pauli |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - StephenG1CMZ - 04-14-2017, 08:58 PM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - pier4r - 04-14-2017, 09:19 PM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - rprosperi - 04-15-2017, 12:00 AM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - Paul Dale - 04-15-2017 12:05 AM
RE: Why no Whetstone benchmark for calculators - StephenG1CMZ - 11-30-2017, 07:18 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)