List Commands Library for 50g

[DavidM]

I was going to post this as a poll, but quickly realized that the only way to create a poll is to start a new thread. I'd rather keep it in this thread, so please respond with your "vote" as appropriate.

The Issue

LSPLT and LRSPL are used to split a list into two parts. In its current form, the result is presented as a list with the two parts embedded as sublists. I've received a suggestion that a preferred approach might be to return the result simply as two separate lists instead of one, as shown below.

Current Example (Method 1)
{ 1 2 3 4 5 }
2
LSPLT

results:
1: { { 1 2 } { 3 4 5 } }

Alternative Example (Method 2a)
{ 1 2 3 4 5 }
2
LSPLT

results:
2: { 1 2 }
1: { 3 4 5 }

Alternative Example (Method 2b)
{ 1 2 3 4 5 }
2
LSPLT

results:
2: { 3 4 5 }
1: { 1 2 }

Please respond with your preferred approach, which I will assume applies to both LSPLT and LRSPL.

I don't have strong feelings about any of the above methods; I see merits to all of them. As such, I will either keep or change those commands for the next release based on the feedback received. I do think it's important that both LSPLT and LRSPL use the same approach, though (whatever it ends up being).