interesting game
|
07-01-2017, 11:56 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: interesting game
Thanks Bill and Dave.
I must be doing something wrong, my figures don't seem to jive with either of yours, although the general approach seems right (go for the biggest numbers [9, 10] first since they are the rarest, I think). I don't consider 36 possible rolls, because 1-3 and 3-1 are the same. I considered these possible rolls: 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-6 2-2 2-3 2-4 2-5 2-6 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 4-4 4-5 4-6 5-5 5-6 6-6 Considering the add, subtract, multiply, and divide for these combinations, I get the following possibilities: 1 - 12 2 - 9 3 - 7 4 - 7 5 - 5 6 - 6 7 - 3 8 - 4 9 - 3 10 - 3 And I assume division must leave no remainder, so for example a 3-2 roll could only yield 5, 1, or 6. Don |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
interesting game - Don Shepherd - 07-01-2017, 01:35 PM
RE: interesting game - Bill (Smithville NJ) - 07-01-2017, 06:53 PM
RE: interesting game - Dave Britten - 07-01-2017, 07:09 PM
RE: interesting game - Don Shepherd - 07-01-2017 11:56 PM
RE: interesting game - Paul Dale - 07-02-2017, 12:25 AM
RE: interesting game - Dave Britten - 07-02-2017, 12:21 AM
RE: interesting game - Don Shepherd - 07-02-2017, 03:51 AM
RE: interesting game - Bill (Smithville NJ) - 07-02-2017, 11:28 AM
RE: interesting game - Don Shepherd - 07-02-2017, 01:01 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)