Benchmark: Savage
|
10-12-2018, 10:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 08:27 AM by StephenG1CMZ.)
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Benchmark: Savage
Version 0.5 is not intended to change timings, but the timings for pythons-in-CAS do seem to be getting slower.
I seemed to have to run Savage V0.4 again before seeing the shorter times in V0.5 - which has me wondering which result is the more representative. Is anyone else seeing a problem? Outside the timed code, PRINT can be suppressed using boolean SP, and TEVAL timings are now returned by the main program. GETNTIMES allows a timing to be repeated, to check repeatability. Code:
Version 0.2 can be compiled in Beta if "I" is changed to "i". Update: See note regarding Python-in-CAS affecting indexing. Stephen Lewkowicz (G1CMZ) https://my.numworks.com/python/steveg1cmz |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 12-03-2017, 11:40 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 12-03-2017, 11:42 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 12-05-2017, 10:51 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 08-29-2018, 07:37 AM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 09-28-2018, 07:20 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 09-29-2018, 08:16 AM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - Albert Chan - 09-29-2018, 10:47 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 09-30-2018, 07:20 AM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - Albert Chan - 09-30-2018, 11:15 AM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - Albert Chan - 09-30-2018, 02:13 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 09-30-2018, 04:54 PM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 10-12-2018, 09:51 AM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 10-12-2018 10:46 AM
RE: Benchmark: Savage - StephenG1CMZ - 11-01-2018, 08:20 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)