Post Reply 
Buon anno nuovo 2019!
01-01-2019, 03:14 AM (This post was last modified: 01-01-2019 03:28 AM by Gerson W. Barbosa.)
Post: #1
Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Buon anno nuovo duemiladiccianove!

Happy new year 2019!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 06:22 AM
Post: #2
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
May you all have a happy and prosperous 2019. Happy New Year.

John
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 09:07 AM
Post: #3
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Godt nytt år Smile

Happy new year :-)

Esben
15C CE, 28s, 35s, 49G+, 50G, Prime G2 HW D, SwissMicros DM32, DM42, DM42n, WP43 Pilot
Elektronika MK-52 & MK-61
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 12:10 PM
Post: #4
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
(01-01-2019 03:14 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote:  Buon anno nuovo duemiladiccianove!

Happy new year 2019!

Feliz ano novo, Gerson!
Just a small correction: duemiladiciannove. ;)

Greetings,
    Massimo

-+×÷ ↔ left is right and right is wrong
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 12:37 PM
Post: #5
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Ich wünsche allen ein frohes und glückliches neues Jahr 2019!

Patrik
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 12:49 PM (This post was last modified: 01-01-2019 01:21 PM by Gerson W. Barbosa.)
Post: #6
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
(01-01-2019 12:10 PM)Massimo Gnerucci Wrote:  
(01-01-2019 03:14 AM)Gerson W. Barbosa Wrote:  Buon anno nuovo duemiladiccianove!

Happy new year 2019!

Feliz ano novo, Gerson!
Just a small correction: duemiladiciannove. Wink

Grazie, Massimo!

Probus would have pointed this out as

diciannove non diccianove

:-)

It’s interesting to see acqua was originally pronounced aqua

I remember my worst mistake regarding Italian numbers occurred when I said diciassei instead of sedici, immediately being corrected by my teacher. (Because in Portuguese we count ...onze, doze, treze, quatorze, quinze, dezesseis...)

Edited to correct yet another mistake.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 03:57 PM (This post was last modified: 01-01-2019 05:05 PM by Eddie W. Shore.)
Post: #7
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Happy New Year!

Ways to calculate 2019: https://edspi31415.blogspot.com/2019/01/...-ways.html
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 07:21 PM (This post was last modified: 01-01-2019 09:29 PM by ijabbott.)
Post: #8
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Happy New Year!

(01-01-2019 03:57 PM)Eddie W. Shore Wrote:  Happy New Year!

Ways to calculate 2019: https://edspi31415.blogspot.com/2019/01/...-ways.html

Also check:



My favourite fact from that video is that 2019 is the hypotenuse of a Pythagorean triple: \( 2019^2 = 1155^2 + 1656^2 \). EDIT: Fixed. Thanks to Mark Hardman for spotting the typo!

— Ian Abbott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 07:25 PM
Post: #9
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Bonne et heureuse année 2019 !
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 07:49 PM (This post was last modified: 01-01-2019 07:50 PM by Jlouis.)
Post: #10
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
Happy New Year

Peace and Health

Long live and Prosper
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 07:56 PM
Post: #11
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
(01-01-2019 07:21 PM)ijabbott Wrote:  My favourite fact from that video is that 2019 is the hypotenuse of a Pythagorean triple: \( 2019^2 = 1152^2 + 1656^2 \).

Not to be a nit picker but, from the video, it is actually: \( 2019^2 = 1155^2 + 1656^2 \).

Ceci n'est pas une signature.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-01-2019, 09:30 PM
Post: #12
RE: Buon anno nuovo 2019!
(01-01-2019 07:56 PM)Mark Hardman Wrote:  
(01-01-2019 07:21 PM)ijabbott Wrote:  My favourite fact from that video is that 2019 is the hypotenuse of a Pythagorean triple: \( 2019^2 = 1152^2 + 1656^2 \).

Not to be a nit picker but, from the video, it is actually: \( 2019^2 = 1155^2 + 1656^2 \).

Thanks for spotting that. I've edited my post to fix it.

— Ian Abbott
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: